Skip to main content

Former FBI Agents Have A Lot Of Questions About Matt Gaetz’s Story


Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) has a story to counter allegations that he faces a federal criminal investigation into accusations of sex trafficking.

It goes like this: Gaetz is actually a victim, but of a separate extortion scheme.

A former prosecutor — now a lawyer in Pensacola — allegedly approached Gaetz’s father with the extortion threat, sparking the Gaetz clan to spring into action: they contacted the FBI, resulting in a meeting between Gaetz’s father and the alleged extortionist while the elder Gaetz was wearing a wire.

When the New York Times story came out, the Florida Republican maintains, that blew up the final piece of the FBI’s sting operation: the elder Gaetz had planned to wire $4.5 million to the alleged extortionist, thereby nailing the case.

Gaetz let this account out in dribs and drabs, with most of it appearing in a bizarre interview with Tucker Carlson Tuesday night. Gaetz’s father Don has provided a similar story to Politico, saying that the FBI had him wired up in a bid to expose the extortion scheme.

When asked about the investigative tactics that Gaetz described, former FBI agents that TPM spoke with had serious questions about elements of the story, but allowed that a second investigation, focused on extortion, wasn’t implausible on its face.

“If he went to the FBI and said, ‘I’m being extorted for $25 million,’ it makes sense that they wire up the father to have a meeting with the person that is trying to scam them,” Tom O’Connor, a former FBI counterterrorism special agent and past president of the FBI Agents’ Association, told TPM. “That would mean that person is gathering evidence on the scammer.”

This, O’Connor suggested, would be a situation in which word of the first DOJ investigation got out, and someone else tried to use it to extort Gaetz. Unlikely, but plausible.

O’Connor said that other elements of the story — including Gaetz’s claim that his extorter offered him a pardon from President Joe Biden in exchange for a $25 million payment — was suspicious.

“Why would he believe that?” O’Connor said.

Gaetz and his father also both claim that they were supposed to wire a “down payment” of the supposed extortion money on Wednesday — today. That part of the plot was supposedly only foiled because the New York Times publicized the investigation itself.

That allegation, however, provoked more consternation among former FBI officials.

“It’s an issue of how far you let this go on,” Kenneth V. Lanning, a retired FBI special agent who focused on crimes of child abuse during his career.

Take the case of Michael Avenatti, who federal prosecutors charged with extortion in March 2019. In that case, Avenatti demanded a payment of $25 million from Nike in exchange for him keeping his silence about damaging information he said he had regarding the company.

After approaching the FBI, the company refused to pay up but sent executives wearing a wire to a meeting with the attorney. When Avenatti threatened to release the information, he was immediately arrested.

“It’s on a case-to-case basis,” Lanning said, when asked how frequently the FBI asks people to send money in extortion cases, adding that electronic transfers made it more difficult, though not impossible, to keep track of the money. “It’s different from the old days when you put it in a brown paper bag and left it in the park — it’s harder to keep track of now.”

Mark Politt, a Syracuse University professor and former FBI special agent, told TPM in an email that the FBI directing the victims of an extortion scheme to go through with a wire transfer was “possible, but unlikely.”

“The actual receipt of the proceeds are not usually required,” Politt wrote. “It is the threat that is key.

Gaetz named Pensacola attorney David McGee as the alleged extorter.

McGee did not return multiple requests for comment to his email and phone or via his subordinates. He denied to the Washington Post that he was involved, and accused Gaetz of trying to distract from his own alleged troubles with the law. His law firm issued a statement calling Gaetz’s accusation “false and defamatory.”

Beggs and Lane responds to Rep. Gaetz’s allegation that attorney David McGee tried to extort Gaetz. “The allegation by the Congressman is both false and defamatory.” pic.twitter.com/tWPAmdAExd — Charlie Gile (@CharlieGileNBC) March 31, 2021

Gaetz’s father told Politico that he had told the FBI he was “willing to wear a wire and be cooperative” in a meeting with McGee, but that he “was asked to say things that are not true to draw out an admission.”

It is not clear what kind of admission the elder Gaetz was referring to.

“I wanted there to be an understanding committed in writing that I’m working for the FBI and at their request, not operating on my own,” the elder Gaetz told Politico.

McGee told the Washington Post that he did meet with Gaetz’s father.

“If there is a tape, play the tape,” McGee said. “There is nothing on that tape that is untoward. It is a pleasant conversation of a dad concerned about his son and the trouble his son was in.”

It is, of course, hard to make heads or tails of any of this. But the addition of a separate extortion plot would add another level of insanity to an already absurd scenario.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Allies of Rep. Adam Kinzinger launch super PAC to support Republicans who have bucked Trump

Founders of the group, which include Kinzinger advisers, are also launching a sister nonprofit to “build a grass roots army,” according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post. Unlike traditional PACs, both organizations can accept unlimited contributions. Nonprofit groups are not required to disclose the identity of their contributors. AD Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) posted a video on Jan. 7, 2020, the day after pro-Trump riots at the Capitol, saying, “It is time to invoke the 25th Amendment.” (@RepKinzinger/Twitter) The effort will be up against significant head winds, as Trump still holds vast sway over the Republican Party — even after his supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol in an effort to stop the certification of President Biden’s victory. AD The new groups, which aim to mobilize the kinds of anti-Trump donors who backed the now-embattled Lincoln Project, are being launched as the former president is planning to expand his political operation with his own super PAC. Kinzin...

Matt Gaetz tried to loop Tucker Carlson into the underage sex allegations against him

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) is trying to tell us that he’s not going down alone. Last night, the much-maligned congressman lowkey tried to implicate Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson (and his wife) into his sex abuse allegations during an unusual interview on live television. Featured Video Hide According to a New York Times report, Gaetz, an ally of former President Donald Trump, is at the part of a Justice Department investigation into a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old. He potentially faces charges related to federal sex trafficking laws. Advertisement Hide The Times also reports that “the investigation was opened in the final months of the Trump administration under Attorney General William Barr” with senior Justice Department officials aware of the inquiry. Gaetz has not been charged “and the extent of his criminal exposure is unclear,” according to the Times. This is WILD.@MattGaetz to #Tucker: "It is a horrible allegation and it is a lie. The New York Times is running a sto...

Federal ‘jack-booted thugs’ are roaming Portland. Where is the NRA now? (Your letters)

To the Editor: Back in 1995, the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre complained, “The government is full of jack-booted thugs in bucket helmets” trampling on our constitutional rights. Now we see presumably federal government agents, this time in military camouflage, wearing no badges, forcing peaceable protesters into unmarked vehicles in Portland, Oregon. Where is the NRA and all those who complained then? Our President Donald Trump has threatened to do the same in other cities, in spite of the objections by the mayor and governor of the place it has already happened. Our president, his agency heads and the agents themselves swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. I took an oath to defend the Constitution, too. I’ve been retired from the Army almost a half century but two things upset me about this use of anonymous federal agents: First, it is wrong. Second, camouflage is intended for fighting in the field; so, who dispatched agents into a city clad in that costume? Stanley H. Roe Hamilton