Skip to main content

Congressional Republicans have only as much power as Democrats give them. Democrats should give them none.


click to enlarge mccv / Shutterstock.com

President Joe Biden speaks during the 59th Presidential Inauguration at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 20, 2021.

Joe Biden hadn't finished his first full day as president before Sean Hannity declared that he'd had a "disastrous first week."

This blunt-force stupidity is nothing new for Donald Trump's lickspittle in chief, and not unexpected as Rupert Murdoch's Pravda struggles to claw back viewers from the conspiracy loons at Newsmax and OANN. What's interesting, however, is what prompted the Fox News host's snap judgment:



Biden did what he promised.

He brought the U.S. back into the Paris climate accord and the World Health Organization. He stopped the Keystone XL Pipeline and the border wall. He froze new fossil fuel extraction permits on federal lands. He rescinded Trump's travel ban and expanded protections for LGBTQ people. He paused most deportations and released a comprehensive immigration proposal with an eight-year path to citizenship. To go along with a $1.9 trillion COVID relief package, he offered the detailed pandemic plan Trump never bothered to produce.

If you paid attention during the campaign, none of these things was surprising. Given what Biden inherited — an accelerating climate crisis, a pandemic killing 4,000 Americans a day, a nonexistent vaccination plan, an economy on the brink of a double-dip recession, rising far-right extremism — they're hardly radical, either.

To listen to Republicans, however, you'd think he handed down a Five Year Plan.

What's exasperating isn't the bad-faith campaign to redefine "socialism" to mean "spending money to help people during a crisis" or "regulating industries that are destroying the planet." Republicans have done that my entire life. Rather — as we discussed last time — it's redefining "unity" to mean "don't do anything we don't like."

Take, for example, Sen. Marco Rubio, a Florida robot who has yet to be reprogrammed for the post-Trump era: "A radical leftist agenda in a divided country will not help unify our country, it will only confirm 75 million Americans' biggest fears about the new administration." (Trump got 74.2 million votes.)

Or Sen. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming: "A mere 24 hours ago, President Biden stood before America promising to unify our nation. Yet on day one, he took divisive actions to devastate Wyoming's economy."

Or Rep. Victoria Spartz of Indiana, who tweeted that Biden "is going with a partisan approach on key issues like energy policy, immigration, and border security. ... Doesn't seem very unifying."

There are variations on the theme, like Sen. Lindsey Graham whining that Biden was following the "Obama playbook": "Blame your predecessor, claim everything is in shambles." (As if Obama and Biden took office amid rainbows and sunshine.) Or conspiracy theorist Sen. Rand Paul — who might be telling on himself — complaining that Biden's denunciations of white supremacy and disinformation were attacks on conservatives like him.

Anything Biden does will be divisive because, for Republicans, unity exists on their terms.

Never mind that Republicans lost — the House, the Senate, the presidency, all of it. Ignore, too, that we're talking about unity only because Republican gaslighting incited an insurrection.

But while any conversation about unity should begin with Republicans groveling, the onus will inevitably fall on Democrats. Republicans know the national media will equate unity with bipartisanship, which gives them leverage. If they withhold support, legislation becomes "partisan" — i.e., "divisive" — and the press will frame obstruction as Biden's failure to compromise. It worked during the Obama years; there's no reason to think it won't this time, too.

Here's the thing to bear in mind: Congressional Republicans have only as much power as Democrats give them.

Republicans' only mechanism to stop legislation is the Senate filibuster. But Senate Democrats could nuke the filibuster with a simple majority vote. Mitch McConnell knows that. He knows, too, that while the Beltway media is drawn to facile promises of bipartisanship like moths to flames, there's a growing contingent of progressives who will no longer play the game.



That’s why he tried to filibuster the Senate’s organizing resolution to lock in the filibuster.



The curious thing is that Democrats lack the votes to go nuclear. A handful of Dems are unequivocal nos, and the only thing that might change their minds is if Republicans proved to be unflinching obstructionists. That McConnell wants to remove Democrats' leverage now makes you wonder how strong his newfound commitment to Senate norms really is.

It's no exaggeration to say the success of the Biden administration — and the future of American democracy — rides on Chuck Schumer telling McConnell to pound sand, which he did. Now that McConnell has backed down, Biden’s agenda — and perhaps the future of American democracy itself — will depend on Democrats ignoring the unity scolds and jettisoning this anachronism at the first sign of Republican intransigence.



It's not just that Republicans will prevent the administration from delivering policies the country voted for. It's that the right-wing populism that propelled Trump to power thrives on dysfunctional government, and the filibuster makes the legislative branch dysfunctional.

Remember that Republican power derives from undemocratic anachronisms (e.g., the Electoral College and the Senate) and racist policies (e.g., gerrymandering) that elevate white, rural voters at the expense of diverse, urban populations. To wit: Biden defeated Trump by more than 7 million votes and 4.4 percentage points, yet Trump came within about 40,000 votes, spread across three states, of winning the Electoral College. Another data point: In the 50–50 Senate, Dems represent some 42 million more people than Republicans.

In other words, this is a center-left country that gives the far-right a head start, and the filibuster is yet another means by which the seditionists who tried to disenfranchise millions of voters on Jan. 6 can continue subverting the will of the people through Biden's presidency.

To eliminate this Senate institution, they'll scold through crocodile tears, would be too "divisive" for a nation that needs "healing."

What the nation needs isn't handwringing over Senate procedures. What it needs — and what voters will care about in 2022 — are results, and you won't get those if McConnell has a veto.

If Republicans want unity, they should act like it. If not, get them out of the way. After Trump's incompetent, revanchist authoritarianism, we need some goddamn grown-ups in charge.

Sorry if the truth isn't unifying.

Get more Informed Dissent delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today at billman.substack.com.

Stay on top of Detroit news and views. Sign up for our weekly issue newsletter delivered each Wednesday.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biden says K-12 education isn't working — calls for free pre-K to "grade 14"

President Joe Biden on Wednesday praised the nation's K-12 education system for fueling America's economic growth for almost a century. But, he stressed, that system may no longer be sufficient as the foundation for future prosperity. Mr. Biden's American Families Plan is taking aim at an issue that has bedeviled economists as well as millions of families struggling to stay afloat financially: A high school diploma is no longer enough to secure a middle-class life. Under the White House proposal, the nation's K-12 system would be expanded on both ends — from free pre-kindergarten education through a "grade 14," funding two years of schooling before kindergarten and two years of post-high school education through free community college. There's plenty of economic research that links rising high school graduation rates throughout the 20th century to faster U.S. economic growth. For example, broadening education help women enter the workforce and enabled men ...

New climate envoy John Kerry sold off energy holdings to avoid conflict of interest, disclosures show

Financial disclosures released by former Secretary of State John Kerry indicate that until March of this year he held hundreds of thousands of dollars of investments in energy-related companies that may end up being affected by policies he'll help shape as President Joe Biden's new climate envoy. An ABC News analysis of his assets show that in recent years, Kerry held stakes in at least three dozen companies related to the energy industry, including firms dealing in electric, oil and gas, and nuclear energy, with shares worth between $204,000 and $960,000. Kerry had also recently held high-ranking positions within firms and entities that could end up being regulated by his climate action policies, filings show. A certificate of divestiture issued by the Office of Government Ethics on March 8 shows Kerry's plan to divest from companies that could pose a conflict of interest for his new role as U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, a common measure that newly appointed...

Column: The Tucker Carlson mystery — how does his show survive without major advertisers?

It used to be that the economics of television were pretty straightforward: broadcasters sold advertising to sponsors, who were willing to pay more to hawk their wares on the highest-rated programs. The biggest shows and stars attracted the classiest advertisers — luxury car makers, popular consumer products, brokerages and banks. Things have obviously changed radically, or how else could one explain the phenomenon of Tucker Carlson? We have a moral obligation to admit the world’s poor, they tell us, even if it makes our own country poorer, and dirtier, and more divided. Tucker Carlson, 2018 Advertisement Carlson is the undisputed star of Fox News Channel. In the April Nielsen ratings he trounced all other cable news programming, with an average audience of more than 3 million viewers. His Tucker Carlson Tonight also finished first in the sought-after 25-54 age segment, averaging 523,000 viewers. Yet the advertising lineup of Carlson’s show displays virtually no class at all. Judging f...