Skip to main content

Trump told donors at a closed-door event that he will have his 'own team' and law enforcement monitoring polling places and is planning to dispute individual ballots


President Donald Trump told supporters at a closed-door event in Nashville that his campaign expects to dispute individual ballots, reported The Washington Post.

In several states, Republicans have argued that ballots received after Election Day should not be counted, and in others, signature verification is expected to be a key issue.

Trump has for months trailed Biden in the polls and stirred fears of widespread voter fraud that have been rebutted by election officials.

Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

President Trump told donors in Nashville last week that he would have his own "team" and law enforcement monitoring polling places, and that his campaign is poised to challenge individual ballots, The Washington Post reported.

The president told supporters at the closed-door fundraiser that "my biggest risk of losing is probably fraud," according to a person present who spoke on condition of anonymity to the Post.

In other remarks at the event reported by the Post, Trump sounded a pessimistic note, and said that holding on to the Senate would be "tough."

Both the Trump and Biden campaigns are preparing for courtroom battles after Election Day on November 3, amid an unprecedented surge in Americans voting using mail-in ballots. A Trump campaign official told the Post that it had 8,500 lawyers on standby to "sue if we need to."

The grounds on which the Trump campaign will likely dispute votes have become more apparent in recent weeks.

The Republicans in a series of states key to Trump's reelection campaign arguing against the validity of ballots arriving after Election Day as the president continues to trail Democratic nominee Joe Biden in the polls.

Bob Bauer, an attorney on Biden's campaign, warned in an interview with Reuters that attempts to dispute the outcome of the election "won't succeed," and Democrats have accused the GOP of illegally seeking to discount ballots so Trump can cling on to power.

Republicans say that they are merely seeking to ensure the election is fair and transparent. Justin Riemer, chief counsel for the Republican National Committee, told the Post that Republican officials would be seeking to ensure "that election officials are following the law and counting every lawful ballot."

The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with Republicans who had argued that ballots in Wisconsin received after Election Day should not be counted.

Still, the court ruled on Wednesday that in North Carolina, a Republican-leaning state where Biden is competitive, ballots received after Election Day could still be counted. In the crucial swing state of Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court rejected a Republican challenge to a three-day extension for counting mail-in ballots.

In Pennsylvania and Minnesota, mail-in ballots received after Election Day will be held separately, making it potentially easier for Republicans to dispute their validity.

But the validity of signature data could be another area where Republicans seek to dispute the validity of ballots, and contest election results, with GOP lawyers in Nevada this week questioning election signature verification processes, the Las Vegas Review Journal reported.

Millions of Americans have cast their ballots by post as the coronavirus continues to sweep the US. Republicans believe that Democrats are more likely to vote by mail or cast absentee ballots, and Republicans vote in-person on Election Day.

Trump has long stirred fears that Democrats are plotting to fix the election with widespread voter fraud, a claim repeatedly rebutted by election experts and the federal government's election officials.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biden says K-12 education isn't working — calls for free pre-K to "grade 14"

President Joe Biden on Wednesday praised the nation's K-12 education system for fueling America's economic growth for almost a century. But, he stressed, that system may no longer be sufficient as the foundation for future prosperity. Mr. Biden's American Families Plan is taking aim at an issue that has bedeviled economists as well as millions of families struggling to stay afloat financially: A high school diploma is no longer enough to secure a middle-class life. Under the White House proposal, the nation's K-12 system would be expanded on both ends — from free pre-kindergarten education through a "grade 14," funding two years of schooling before kindergarten and two years of post-high school education through free community college. There's plenty of economic research that links rising high school graduation rates throughout the 20th century to faster U.S. economic growth. For example, broadening education help women enter the workforce and enabled men ...

New climate envoy John Kerry sold off energy holdings to avoid conflict of interest, disclosures show

Financial disclosures released by former Secretary of State John Kerry indicate that until March of this year he held hundreds of thousands of dollars of investments in energy-related companies that may end up being affected by policies he'll help shape as President Joe Biden's new climate envoy. An ABC News analysis of his assets show that in recent years, Kerry held stakes in at least three dozen companies related to the energy industry, including firms dealing in electric, oil and gas, and nuclear energy, with shares worth between $204,000 and $960,000. Kerry had also recently held high-ranking positions within firms and entities that could end up being regulated by his climate action policies, filings show. A certificate of divestiture issued by the Office of Government Ethics on March 8 shows Kerry's plan to divest from companies that could pose a conflict of interest for his new role as U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, a common measure that newly appointed...

Column: The Tucker Carlson mystery — how does his show survive without major advertisers?

It used to be that the economics of television were pretty straightforward: broadcasters sold advertising to sponsors, who were willing to pay more to hawk their wares on the highest-rated programs. The biggest shows and stars attracted the classiest advertisers — luxury car makers, popular consumer products, brokerages and banks. Things have obviously changed radically, or how else could one explain the phenomenon of Tucker Carlson? We have a moral obligation to admit the world’s poor, they tell us, even if it makes our own country poorer, and dirtier, and more divided. Tucker Carlson, 2018 Advertisement Carlson is the undisputed star of Fox News Channel. In the April Nielsen ratings he trounced all other cable news programming, with an average audience of more than 3 million viewers. His Tucker Carlson Tonight also finished first in the sought-after 25-54 age segment, averaging 523,000 viewers. Yet the advertising lineup of Carlson’s show displays virtually no class at all. Judging f...