Skip to main content

Trump Admin Refuses to Release 112 Records of Federal Agency’s Correspondence with Mueller About Michael Flynn


The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) said Friday that it would not release more than 100 documents of correspondence between agency employees and former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office. Those documents contain details of discussions about former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

DIA revealed the existence of the records in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted more than a year ago by BuzzFeed News reporter Jason Leopold. The requests sought “[a]ll records of correspondence between the DIA and the Office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller” that mentioned or referenced Flynn in any way. In a two-page letter to Leopold dated Friday, the agency stated that it would be withholding all of the responsive documents, claiming they were exempt from public disclosure laws.

“A search of DIA’s systems of records located 112 records of correspondence responsive to the request above. Upon review, it has been determined that all of the substantive portions of all of these records must be withheld in full from disclosure pursuant to the FOIA,” the letter read.

DIA, one of the worst federal government agencies that routinely violates #FOIA and an agency I often sue, has 112 records related to it's correspondence with Mueller about Michael Flynn. They took nearly 2 years to tell me they're withholding all of it pic.twitter.com/9gUNI78ST4 — Jason Leopold (@JasonLeopold) October 31, 2020

The agency stated that the withheld portions did not have to be disclosed under “Exemptions 1, 3, 5, and 7” of the law.

“As you know, the criminal prosecution of Michael Flynn remains pending,” the agency wrote, highlighting Exemption 7A, which applies to information and records gathered by law enforcement that could reasonably be expected to interfere in enforcement proceedings.

BuzzFeed will have to file a legal challenge if it hopes to obtain any of the records from DIA. On Friday, though, the Department of Justice (DOJ) did release a new cache of interviews conducted by the Special Counsel’s Office during the investigation into Russian election interference. The documents were released in accordance with a court order stemming from another FOIA lawsuit filed by BuzzFeed and Leopold over excessive redactions to the publicly released version of the Mueller Report.

In a separate but related matter, a federal district court last month ordered the DOJ to release by Nov. 2 “at least 15 previously blacked-out pages from volume one” of the Mueller report which “appear to involve discussions related to the hack of emails from the Democratic National Committee in early 2016 and the Trump campaign’s interest in those documents when WikiLeaks released them that June.”

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan still has not ruled on DOJ’s motion to dismiss the criminal case against Flynn.

[image via House Judiciary Committee]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Allies of Rep. Adam Kinzinger launch super PAC to support Republicans who have bucked Trump

Founders of the group, which include Kinzinger advisers, are also launching a sister nonprofit to “build a grass roots army,” according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post. Unlike traditional PACs, both organizations can accept unlimited contributions. Nonprofit groups are not required to disclose the identity of their contributors. AD Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) posted a video on Jan. 7, 2020, the day after pro-Trump riots at the Capitol, saying, “It is time to invoke the 25th Amendment.” (@RepKinzinger/Twitter) The effort will be up against significant head winds, as Trump still holds vast sway over the Republican Party — even after his supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol in an effort to stop the certification of President Biden’s victory. AD The new groups, which aim to mobilize the kinds of anti-Trump donors who backed the now-embattled Lincoln Project, are being launched as the former president is planning to expand his political operation with his own super PAC. Kinzin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Matt Gaetz tried to loop Tucker Carlson into the underage sex allegations against him

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) is trying to tell us that he’s not going down alone. Last night, the much-maligned congressman lowkey tried to implicate Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson (and his wife) into his sex abuse allegations during an unusual interview on live television. Featured Video Hide According to a New York Times report, Gaetz, an ally of former President Donald Trump, is at the part of a Justice Department investigation into a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old. He potentially faces charges related to federal sex trafficking laws. Advertisement Hide The Times also reports that “the investigation was opened in the final months of the Trump administration under Attorney General William Barr” with senior Justice Department officials aware of the inquiry. Gaetz has not been charged “and the extent of his criminal exposure is unclear,” according to the Times. This is WILD.@MattGaetz to #Tucker: "It is a horrible allegation and it is a lie. The New York Times is running a sto...
Post a Comment
Read more

Federal ‘jack-booted thugs’ are roaming Portland. Where is the NRA now? (Your letters)

To the Editor: Back in 1995, the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre complained, “The government is full of jack-booted thugs in bucket helmets” trampling on our constitutional rights. Now we see presumably federal government agents, this time in military camouflage, wearing no badges, forcing peaceable protesters into unmarked vehicles in Portland, Oregon. Where is the NRA and all those who complained then? Our President Donald Trump has threatened to do the same in other cities, in spite of the objections by the mayor and governor of the place it has already happened. Our president, his agency heads and the agents themselves swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. I took an oath to defend the Constitution, too. I’ve been retired from the Army almost a half century but two things upset me about this use of anonymous federal agents: First, it is wrong. Second, camouflage is intended for fighting in the field; so, who dispatched agents into a city clad in that costume? Stanley H. Roe Hamilton
Post a Comment
Read more